Home › Topics › Government › Government ethics › Public office and private gain › Public office should not be usable for priv… › Barring members of Congress and the preside… › Equivalence: The belief: “Barring members of Congress and the president…

Equivalence

The belief: “Barring members of Congress and the president from owning or trading individual stocks would reduce the use of public office for private gain” makes the same claim as: “Members of Congress should be required to place individual stocks in a qualified blind trust” 0.50

Used on: Barring members of Congress and the president from owning or trading individual stocks would reduce the use of public office for private gain.

Belief XBarring members of Congress and the president from owning or trading individual stocks would reduce the use of public office for private gain.Truth 0.50
Belief YMembers of Congress should be required to place individual stocks in a qualified blind trust.Truth 0.50

Equivalence ArgumentsOne page per belief →

Reasons to agree that X and Y are the same claim

#Reason (pattern)TruthConfLinkImpUniqScore
1Same truth conditionsBoth remove the official's ability to act on a holding while in office.0.500.001.000.501.00+0.00
2Same evidence settles bothEvidence about whether conflicts persist would bear on both identically.0.500.001.000.501.00+0.00

Reasons to disagree (X and Y differ)

#Reason (pattern)TruthConfLinkImpUniqScore
1Different mechanismA blind trust leaves the asset in place and removes control; a ban removes the asset. The Congressional Research Service notes a trust is not blind at inception, which is a difference in effect rather than in wording.0.500.001.000.501.00-0.00

Total agree 0.00 · total disagree 0.00 · equivalence score 0.50

One page per belief. Reasons here are about whether the two claims have the same truth conditions, never about whether either is true.

Check table

1Exact wording of XBarring members of Congress and the president from owning or trading individual stocks would reduce the use of public office for private gain.
2Exact wording of YMembers of Congress should be required to place individual stocks in a qualified blind trust.
3What separates themA blind trust removes control and keeps ownership; a ban removes ownership.
4Computed equivalence score0.50
5VerdictOverlapping: keep both, name the difference on each page
6Bottom line, typed by the author after the tables aboveOverlapping rather than equivalent: keep both pages and name the difference on each.

The five steps, answered from the pages above. Only the one-sentence bridge and the bottom line are typed.

DefinitionsThe full explanation →

Where This Page Is Used

PageTableAsIts truth
Barring members of Congress and the president from owning or trading individual stocks would reduce the use of public office for private gain.similar beliefsan equivalence0.50

Every page that reads this one. One claim, one home, every use visible.

Scoring EngineTruth scores →

QuantityValueHow
Reasons to agree, total0.00sum of the agree side
Reasons to disagree, total0.00sum of the disagree side
Equivalence score0.50(agree + weight x starting point) / (agree + disagree + weight), starting point 0.50, weight 1.00
ReasonRank0.0000how much of the site depends on this page: rank 2018 of 2173. The share of a walk that starts at the 162 beliefs and steps to the pages they read, with a 0.85 chance of stepping on each time
Work value0.0000ReasonRank x (1 - confidence): how much settling this page would be worth to everything above it
Completenessyesat least one scored reason on each side (an importance page: at least one interest; an interest page: both readings filled)

Cite this page The belief: “Barring members of Congress and the president from owning or trading individual stocks would reduce the use of public office for private gain” makes the same claim as: “Members of Congress should be required to place individual stocks in a qualified blind trust”. Idea Stock Exchange, equivalence page equiv-barring-members-congress-members-congress-2, truth 0.50, confidence 28%, revision 42c8344 of 2026-10-04. The revision is what makes this quotable: these numbers move as the argument is worked on, and rebuilding that revision reproduces them exactly.

Every number on this page as data: equiv-barring-members-congress-members-congress-2.json. Constants: K = 1 · UNARG = 0.5 · DEFLINK = 1 · DEFIMP = 0.5 · DEFUNIQ = 1. A reason placed under a conclusion is presumed relevant until a linkage page says otherwise; the burden is on the challenger. The neutral start for importance, the wiki's own rule.

Every value here is computed from the tables above at build time. Nothing is typed.